FYI -
Gen. Boykin (Video)
Showing posts with label Sharia Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sharia Law. Show all posts
Friday, February 25, 2011
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Muslim Youth arrested on Terrorism charges in Texas: Targeted Bush home; 12 Dams, Nuke Plants in Colorado, California
*From Libertarianrepublican.net
Muslim Youth arrested on Terrorism charges in Texas: Targeted Bush home; 12 Dams, Nuke Plants in Colorado, California
Came to US on a Student Visa, specifically so he could carry out Terror ActsFrom Eric Dondero:
Just breaking from CNN, Fox News, and various local media...
A Saudi national has been arrested on charges of planning a terrorist attack on the home of former President George W. Bush. In addition, he is alleged to have plotted to use weapons of mass destruction on at least 12 hydroelectric dams and nuclear power plants located in Colorado and California. There are other indications that he might have been planning a bombing at a nightclub, as well.
Just one Ingredient away from Trinitrophenol or T.N.P.
From the Houston Chronicle "Saudi citizen at Texas college arrested in bomb plot":
WASHINGTON - Khalid Ali-M Aldawsari, 20, a citizen of Saudi Arabia and resident of Lubbock, Texas, was arrested late yesterday by FBI agents in Texas on a federal charge of attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction in connection with his alleged purchase of chemicals and equipment necessary to make an improvised explosive device (IED) and his research of potential U.S. targets.
This was not a sting operation. Rather, a chemical company located in North Carolina, became suspicious of Aldawsari's order, of a unique substance concentrated phenol. The substance can be used in explosive material trinitrophenol, also known as T.N.P.The Chronicle further explains:
Aldawsari allegedly attempted to have the phenol order shipped to a freight company so it could be held for him there, but the freight company returned the order to the supplier and called the police.Aldawsari had already obtained all of the other ingredients to make the explosive.

Even more alarming, Aldawsari used his status as a Student "researcher" to obtain the chemical compounds.Continuing:
Later, Aldawsari falsely told the supplier he was associated with a university and wanted the phenol for "off-campus, personal research."Additionally:
He has also acquired or taken a substantial step toward acquiring most of the ingredients and equipment necessary to construct an IED and he has conducted online research of several potential U.S. targets...Internet Posts: "Wage Jihad on the Infidels," opposed Iraq War
Aldawsari obtained a student Visa to come to the US specifically to launch the attacks. Records indicate he was attending a mainly career training 2-year school, South Plains College in Lubbock, Texas. Lubbock is also home to Texas Tech. (Texas Tech has a very active and organized Muslim Student Association. TTU MSA website).


Federal authorities say Aldawsari's diary indicated the young man had been plotting an attack for years and obtained a scholarship so he could come directly to the United State to carry out jihad.Plans were also found by authorities in Aldawsari's possession, on chemical ingredients needed to construct Nitro Urea explosives, booby traps, and cell phone detonators.
Aldawsari was apparently just days away from launching the attacks, "and that the suspect was one chemical away from finishing a bomb." An entry in his diary states:
"And now, after mastering the English language, learning how to build explosives and continuous planning to target the infidel Americans, it is time for Jihad."Aldawsari also made extremist posts on the internet.
From WTSP Tampa Bay (via CBS):
"It is war ... until the infidels leave defeated," the student wrote in online postings.He also referred to one of his targets, Bush's Dallas-area residence, as "the Tyrant's home."
POSTED BY ERIC DONDERO AT 1:29 PM
Brigitte Gabriel: Radical Imam Choudary Frightening Prediction
A MUST READ! - Dearborn, MI officials sued by Christians jailed for preaching to Muslims
Dearborn officials sued by Christians jailed for preaching to Muslims
Posted on February 24, 2011 by creeping
Bravo. An update on sharia law in Dearborn. via Sharia in the U.S.A.: Christians Jailed for Preaching to Muslims–Dearborn, MI Officials Sued.
The Thomas More Law Center (TMLC) announced today that the City of Dearborn, its Mayor, John B. O’Reilly, its Chief of Police, Ronald Haddad, 17 City police officers, and two executives of the American Arab Chamber of Commerce were named as defendants in a ninety-six page federal civil rights lawsuit filed in the Federal District Court in Detroit this morning.
The lawsuit, brought by TMLC and co-counsel and Sharia law expert, David Yerushalmi, stems from two separate police actions at the June 2010 Dearborn, Michigan Annual International Arab Festival.
Richard Thompson, TMLC President and Chief Counsel, commented, “Muslims dominate the political and law enforcement process in Dearborn. It seems that police were more interested in placating the Mayor and Muslims than obeying our Constitution. Sharia law makes it a crime to preach the Gospel to Muslims. This is a classic example of stealth Jihad being waged right here in America. And it should be a wake-up call for all patriotic Americans.”
The first incident occurred on June 18, when police jailed four Christian missionaries when they witnessed Dr. Nabeel Qureshi, a Muslim convert to Christianity, peaceably discussing his Christian faith with Muslim youths. The other three, David Wood, Paul Rezkalla, and Negeen Mayel, were arrested along with Qureshi for allegedly “breaching the peace.” The Christians were led away in handcuffs by police to the applause and cheers of Muslim onlookers who just witnessed a victory of Sharia law over the Christians.
The second incident occurred on June 20, as two missionaries, Rezkalla and Josh Hogg, stood on the public sidewalk handing out the Gospel of John to passersby willing to take them. The Christians were there for approximately 5 minutes when eight City police officers descended upon them, seized them, and brought them to the police command trailer located inside the festival where the Christians were admonished, photographed, and ordered to stop their peaceful religious activity.
The police assaults and arrests of the Christians, captured on video, caused a national furor over the lawless tactics of the City’s police department.
Dearborn is considered home to the largest Muslim population in America. As a result, it is evident that City officials, including the Mayor, engaged in this unconstitutional official action solely to please this significant voting bloc and to submit to its will.
Dearborn is considered home to the largest Muslim population in America. As a result, it is evident that City officials, including the Mayor, engaged in this unconstitutional official action solely to please this significant voting bloc and to submit to its will.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Acts 17 Apologetics, Dr. Nabeel Qureshi, David Wood, Paul Rezkalla, Negeen Mayel and Josh Hogg.
Robert Muise, TMLC’s Senior Trial Counsel who is handling the matter, stated, “While the videos of the police violating the fundamental constitutional rights of our clients are utterly shocking, it is perhaps even more shocking that City officials, including the Mayor, would engage in a propaganda campaign to smear the good reputation of these Christians even after they were acquitted by a jury of the bogus criminal charges. All of this is strong evidence of the fact that Sharia is negatively influencing the City and its officials.”
More from Answering Muslims, Acts 17 Apologetics vs. City of Dearborn: Lawsuit Complaint Filed Today:
So far in Dearborn . . .
- We’ve been physically assaulted for asking a question at a booth that invited us to ask questions.
- We’ve been thrown in jail for having a peaceful conversation.
- We’ve been slandered and libeled by the Mayor.
- We’ve been blasted by the media (especially by Niraj Warikoo of the Detroit Free Press).
- We’ve been forced to undergo one of the most ridiculous criminal trials in Michigan history.
If you’ve been following this blog for the past two years, you’ve seen Muslim security guards assault our sister Mary Jo Sharp at the Dearborn Arab Festival. You’ve seen Dearborn’s own Corporal Kapanowski assault our sister Negeen. You’ve seen falsified police reports, written by corrupt police officers trying to justify their unlawful arrests. You’ve seen police officers (who take an oath that they will support and defend the Constitution) take us into custody for attempting to hand out copies of the Gospel to Muslims outside the festival. You’ve seen lies from the Mayor, lies from police, and even lies from Christians trying to curry favor with the local Muslims.
For a complete summary of our experience in Dearborn, click here.
Enough is enough. Today, the Thomas More Law Center filed a massive 96-page Complaint against the City of Dearborn. Mayor John B. O’Reilly, Police Chief Ronald Haddad, seventeen Dearborn police officers, and two members of the Arab Chamber of Commerce are officially being sued. If the City of Dearborn refuses to honor the U.S. Constitution, we hope this lawsuit will help persuade them that, so long as Michigan is part of the United States, they have no choice in the matter.
Of course, the City of Dearborn is no stranger to civil rights lawsuits. A Christian wrestling coach sued the City after he was targeted for his faith by a Muslim principal. (The City settled out of court.) Two more Christian teachers at a majority Muslim high school are now suing after being targeted and persecuted for their faith.
Much more at the link above.
Somali’s kill 4 Americans on hijacked yacht
Somali’s kill 4 Americans on hijacked yacht
Posted on February 23, 2011 by creeping
It’s 3AM. Again. Anyone seen Obama or Clinton? via 4 Americans on hijacked yacht dead off Somalia
A pirate fired a rocket-propelled grenade at a U.S. Navy destroyer shadowing a hijacked yacht with four Americans aboard Tuesday. Then gunfire erupted, the military said. U.S. special forces rushed to the yacht only to find the four Americans fatally wounded.
The experienced yacht enthusiasts from California and Washington are the first Americans killed by Somali pirates since the start of attacks off East Africa several years ago. One of the American couples on board had been sailing around the world since 2004 handing out Bibles.
Killing hostages “has now become part of our rules,” said a pirate who identified himself as Muse Abdi and referred to last week’s sentencing of a pirate to 33 years in prison for the 2009 attack on the U.S. cargo vessel the Maersk Alabama.
“From now on, anyone who tries to rescue the hostages in our hands will only collect dead bodies,” he said. “It will never ever happen that hostages are rescued and we are hauled to prison.”
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton strongly condemned the killings, saying in a statement that the slayings were “deplorable” and underscored the need for international cooperation in fighting the scourge of piracy in waters off the Horn of Africa.
Pirates had hijacked the 58-foot yacht Quest south of Oman on Friday. Since then, four U.S. warships and sky-high drones shadowed the vessel’s movementas pirates tried to sail it to the Somali shore. U.S. officials negotiated with the captors via radio.
On Monday, two pirates had peacefully come aboard the USS Sterett to negotiate with naval forces for the release of the hostages, and remained aboard overnight.
But at 8 a.m. East Africa time Tuesday, a rocket-propelled grenade was fired from the Quest at the USS Sterett, a guided-missile destroyer 600 yards away. The RPG missed and almost immediately afterward small arms fire was heard coming from the yacht, said Vice Adm. Mark Fox, commander of the U.S. 5th Fleet in Bahrain.
U.S. forces converged on the Quest in small boats and some pirates moved to bow and put up their hands in surrender.
A member of a U.S. special operations force killed one of the pirates with a knife, Fox said. A second pirate was also killed, and the bodies of two other pirates were discovered on board, bringing to 19 the total number of pirates involved. The U.S. military didn’t say how those two died and it was not known if the pirates had fought among themselves.
The Quest was the home of Jean and Scott Adam, a couple from California who had been sailing around the world since December 2004 with a yacht full of Bibles. The two other Americans on board were Phyllis Macay and Bob Riggle, of Seattle, Wash.
“Great sailors, good people. They were doing what they wanted to do, but that’s small comfort in the face of this,” said Joe Grande of the Seattle Singles Yacht Club, where Riggle and Macay were members.
“We have heard threats against the lives of Americans before but it strikes me as being very, very unusual why they would kill hostages outright,” said Graeme Gibbon-Brooks, the head of Dryad Maritime Intelligence, adding that the pirates must realize that killing Americans would invite a military response.
Gibbon-Brooks said the killings were “extremely unwise” by the Somalis, and that the deaths threaten what has been a successful and lucrative business model.
Unwise in theory, but so was 9/11 and we’ve seen how that’s worked out for the jihad – and Muslims in general. Read it all via CBS News.
- Scott Underwood Adam and Jean Savage Adam of Marina del Rey, Calif., left, owners of the yacht S/V Quest; and a 2005 photo of passengers Phyllis Macay and Bob Riggle, both of Seattle. (svquest.com; AP Photo/Joe Grande)
From a previous post, “From the mouth of our cannon”: brief history of Bainbridge & Muslim piracy:
Like today, the leaders of America in the late 1700’s tried to settle the piracy issue through diplomacy. As such, two American diplomats, Thomas Jefferson, then the American ambassador to France, and John Adams, the American ambassador to Britain, were dispatched to London in 1786 in an attempt to resolve the piracy issue. They met with Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, the “Dey of Algiers” ambassador to Britain. It was during that meeting in London when Jefferson asked the Muslim ambassador why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation they had virtually no contact with at that time.
The answer is as relevant today as it was in 1786 – perhaps even more so. Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja stated :
“Islam was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Qur’an, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Muslim who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
Sound familiar?
Sunday, February 6, 2011
A MUST SEE!!! - Muslims Demand Sharia Law at London Embassy Protests (with Pictures)
FYI -
Londonistan, Eurabia, when will the West wake up?
Protesters waving placards calling for Islamic law to be imposed in Egypt have demonstrated outside the country’s embassy in London.
For several days, a peaceful protest has seen hundreds of ex-patriots and supporters of regime change mass outside the embassy in the centre of the capital.
Today, brandishing signs such as ‘democracy will bring oppression’ and ‘Islam is the solution for Egypt’, women in burkas were joined by men in traditional dress for a rally calling for sharia law to be imposed.
Time for David Cameron to put his money where his mouth is.
UK: Prime Minister Says "State Multiculturalism" Has Failed
Continue reading the main story
Click to play
David Cameron said Britain had encouraged different cultures to live separate lives
Related Stories
Prime Minister David Cameron has criticised "state multiculturalism" in his first speech as prime minister on radicalisation and the causes of terrorism.
At a security conference in Munich, he argued the UK needed a stronger national identity to prevent people turning to all kinds of extremism.
He also signalled a tougher stance on groups promoting Islamist extremism.
The speech angered some Muslim groups, while others queried its timing amid an English Defence League rally in the UK.
As Mr Cameron outlined his vision, he suggested there would be greater scrutiny of some Muslim groups which get public money but do little to tackle extremism.
Ministers should refuse to share platforms or engage with such groups, which should be denied access to public funds and barred from spreading their message in universities and prisons, he argued.
"Frankly, we need a lot less of the passive tolerance of recent years and much more active, muscular liberalism," the prime minister said.
Continue reading the main story
Laura KuenssbergChief political correspondent, BBC News channel
Human rightsAnalysis
David Cameron strode firmly into a debate where many politicians tread timidly.
In his view, such caution is part of the problem. In frank language he made abundantly clear he believes multiculturalism has failed. Any organisation that does not stand up to extremism will be cut off from public funds, and he wants the country to develop a stronger sense of shared identity.
It is the first time he has spoken so directly as prime minister, but there are echoes of what has gone before. Tony Blair edged away from multiculturalism in the years after the 7/7 bombings in London, and his ministers moved to stop funding any community organisation that did not challenge extremism. And what of Gordon Brown's continual quest to strengthen "Britishness"?
Behind the scenes, ministers are reviewing the "prevent" strategy, the policies designed to try to deal with extremism. But the review, which had been planned for publication this month, is likely to be delayed. It is not clear yet how Mr Cameron will translate his strong words into action.
"Let's properly judge these organisations: Do they believe in universal human rights - including for women and people of other faiths? Do they believe in equality of all before the law? Do they believe in democracy and the right of people to elect their own government? Do they encourage integration or separatism?
"These are the sorts of questions we need to ask. Fail these tests and the presumption should be not to engage with organisations," he added.
The Labour MP for Luton South, Gavin Shuker, asked if it was wise for Mr Cameron to make the speech on the same day the English Defence League staged a major protest in his constituency.
There was further criticism from Labour's Sadiq Khan whose comments made in a Daily Mirror article sparked a row.
The shadow justice secretary was reported as saying Mr Cameron was "writing propaganda material for the EDL".
Conservative Party chairman Baroness Warsi hit back, saying that "to smear the prime minister as a right wing extremist is outrageous and irresponsible". She called on Labour leader Ed Miliband to disown the remarks.
Continue reading the main story
“Start Quote
David BlunkettFormer home secretaryIt's time the right hand knew what the far-right hand is doing”
Meanwhile, the Muslim Council of Britain's assistant secretary general, Dr Faisal Hanjra, described Mr Cameron's speech as "disappointing".
He told Radio 4's Today programme: "We were hoping that with a new government, with a new coalition that there'd be a change in emphasis in terms of counter-terrorism and dealing with the problem at hand.
"In terms of the approach to tackling terrorism though it doesn't seem to be particularly new.
"Again it just seems the Muslim community is very much in the spotlight, being treated as part of the problem as opposed to part of the solution."
In the speech, Mr Cameron drew a clear distinction between Islam the religion and what he described as "Islamist extremism" - a political ideology he said attracted people who feel "rootless" within their own countries.
"We need to be clear: Islamist extremism and Islam are not the same thing," he said.
The government is currently reviewing its policy to prevent violent extremism, known as Prevent, which is a key part of its wider counter-terrorism strategy.
Click to play
Inayat Bunglawala from Muslims4Uk says Mr Cameron is "firing at the wrong target"
A genuinely liberal country "believes in certain values and actively promotes them", Mr Cameron said.
"Freedom of speech. Freedom of worship. Democracy. The rule of law. Equal rights, regardless of race, sex or sexuality.
"It says to its citizens: This is what defines us as a society. To belong here is to believe these things."
He said under the "doctrine of state multiculturalism", different cultures have been encouraged to live separate lives.
'I am a Londoner too'"We have failed to provide a vision of society to which they feel they want to belong. We have even tolerated these segregated communities behaving in ways that run counter to our values."
Building a stronger sense of national and local identity holds "the key to achieving true cohesion" by allowing people to say "I am a Muslim, I am a Hindu, I am a Christian, but I am a Londoner... too", he said.
Security minister Baroness Neville-Jones said when Mr Cameron expressed his opposition to extremism, he meant all forms, not just Islamist extremism.
"There's a widespread feeling in the country that we're less united behind values than we need to be," she told Today.
"There are things the government can do to give a lead and encourage participation in society, including all minorities."
But the Islamic Society of Britain's Ajmal Masroor said the prime minister did not appreciate the nature of the problem.
"I think he's confusing a couple of issues: national identity and multiculturalism along with extremism are not connected. Extremism comes about as a result of several other factors," he told BBC Radio 5 live.
Former home secretary David Blunkett said while it was right the government promoted national identity, it had undermined its own policy by threatening to withdraw citizenship lessons from schools.
He accused Education Secretary Michael Gove of threatening to remove the subject from the national curriculum of secondary schools in England at a time "we've never needed it more".
"It's time the right hand knew what the far-right hand is doing," he said.
"In fact, it's time that the government were able to articulate one policy without immediately undermining it with another."
Saturday, February 5, 2011
Rep. Sue Myrick Discusses the Unrest in Egypt and the Danger of the Muslim Brotherhood!
FYI - Some very good information from Congresswoman Sue Myrick (R-NC09) concerning Egypt and the Muslim Brotherhood. Rep. Myrick is the co-founder of the 120 member, Congressional Anti-Terrorism Caucus.
Rep. Myrick Discussing Egypt and the Muslin Brotherhood.
-ADY
Rep. Myrick Discussing Egypt and the Muslin Brotherhood.
-ADY
Senate report: Army, FBI should have prevented Fort Hood jihad
Senate report: Army, FBI should have prevented Fort Hood jihad
Posted on February 4, 2011 by creeping
A Senate investigation of the Fort Hood shootings faults the Army and FBI with missing warning signs and not exchanging information that could have prevented the massacre.
The report, released Thursday, concludes that systemic and cultural problems caused military officials to miss signs that the suspect, Maj. Nidal M. Hasan, was becoming increasingly radical before the 2009 attack.
It also concludes that the FBI did not share information with the Army – notably, e-mails that Hasan, an Army psychiatrist and practicing Muslim, exchanged with a “suspected terrorist,” a likely reference to Anwar al-Aulaqi, an ic cleric known for his extremist views. The report says the agency may have dismissed such clues to avoid causing “a bureaucratic confrontation.”
At a news conference Thursday, Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (I-Conn.) said the investigation’s “painful conclusion is that the Fort Hood massacre could have and should have been prevented.”
In particular, Lieberman said the report, issued by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, indicates that the FBI had compelling evidence of extremism that should have led to Hasan’s military discharge and made him the subject of a counterterrorism investigation.
From the report:
A JTTF learn ed that Hasan was communicating with the Suspected Terrori st, flagged Hasan’s initial [REDACTED] communicat ions for further review, and passed them to a second JTTF for an inquiry. However, the ensuing inqu iry fai led to identi fy the totality of Hasan’s communications and to inform Hasan’s mi li tary chain of comman d and Army sec urity officials of the fac t th at he was communicating with a suspected violent Islamist extremi st – a shocking course of conduct for a U.S. mi li tary officer. Instead, the JTTF inquiry relied on Hasan’s erroneous Offi cer Evaluation Reports and ult imately dismissed his comm uni cat ions as legitimate research. Th e JTTF that had reviewed the initial [REDACTED] co mmunicati ons di smi ssed the second JTTF ‘s work as “slim” but eventually dropped the matter rather than cause a bureaucratic confron tation. The JTTFs now even dispute the extent to which they were in con tact with each other in this case. Nonetheless, th e JTTFs never raised the dispute to FBI headquarters for resolution, and en tities in FB I headquarters responsibl e for coordination among fie ld offices never acted. As a result, th e FB I’s inquiry into Hasan ended premature! y.
Who was the second JTTF that thought emailing al Awlaki was legitimate research? This is the Joint Terrorism Task Force -”the principal domestic federal operational arm for counterterrorism investigations and intelligence collection” – is it not?
Joe Lieberman and the Senate committee are all over it:
The threat of homegrown radicalization goes beyond the capabilities of the law enforcement, intelligence, and homeland security agencies and requires a response from a broad range of our government which will produce plans to translate and implement this comprehensive national approach into specific, coordinated, and measurable actions across th e government andin cooperation with the Muslim-American community.
The government – one that won’t even say jihad or Islamic terrorism, in cooperation with the Muslim-American community – i.e., CAIR, ISNA, Keith Ellison, more Nidal Hassan’s – are going to resolve the issue of Islamic terrorism in the U.S.? That sounds eerily similar to Obama’s new counter terrorism adviser.
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Bill Aimed at Protecting South Carolina From Foreign Law Introduced in Legislature. Urge North Carolina To Do The Same!
FYI - Similar legislation has already been passed in Tennessee and Lousiana and has been introduced in Oklahoma and Texes. I have already contacted the Governor's office, the State Attorney General's office, and my state senators and representative. I ask that you read the below article and then do the same. Below the article, I have included the text of my letter. Feel free to use it as a template.
Gov. Bev Perdue:
The Hon. Bev. Perdue
Office of the Governor
20301 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-0301
Phone: (919)733-4240
Fax: (919)733-2120
c/o The Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina
9001 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-9001
Telephone: (919) 716-6400
Fax: (919) 716-6750
Gov. Bev Perdue:
The Hon. Bev. Perdue
Office of the Governor
20301 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-0301
Phone: (919)733-4240
Fax: (919)733-2120
Attorney General Roy Cooper:
The Hon. Roy Cooperc/o The Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina
9001 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-9001
Telephone: (919) 716-6400
Fax: (919) 716-6750
Online Contact Form: http://www.ncdoj.gov/Home/ContactNCDOJ.aspx
North Carolina General Assembly:
Senator/Representative Look Up: http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/GIS/RandR07/Representation.html
-ADY
-ADY
Bill Aimed at Protecting S.C. From Foreign Law Introduced in Legislature by W. Thomas Smith Jr. 01/26/2011 COLUMBIA, S.C. – A legislative initiative aimed at preventing “a court or other enforcement authority” from enforcing foreign law in the Palmetto State was introduced today in both the S.C. House and Senate by Rep. Wendy Nanney (who drafted the bill) and Sen. Mike Fair respectively, who say the bill will preempt violations of a person’s constitutional rights resulting from the application of foreign law. Legislators and other proponents of the bill say America has unique values of liberty which do not exist in foreign legal systems. Yet foreign laws are increasingly finding their way into U.S. court cases, particularly in the area of family law, involving divorce and child custody where, for instance, Islamic Shariah Law has been invoked in several U.S. states. According to Christopher Holton with the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Security Policy (CSP), “There are numerous examples in dozens of states in which parties to such a dispute attempted to invoke Shariah.” Fair agrees, which is why he introduced the bill in the Senate. “S.C., like other states, recognizes the need to assert the fact that our state and U.S. constitutions are the basis for civil law in our country,” says Fair. “Some locales have been threatened by the encroachment of foreign law into local, state and or federal law despite obvious violations of our constitutions. A growing concern is the immigration of people who are accustomed to their religion and their civil laws being inextricably connected. For those newcomers to our state, this bill will be helpful to them as they are assimilated into our culture maintaining complete freedom to worship as they please.” Nanney, who introduced the bill in the House with 20 sponsors and co-sponsors, says that “in speaking with several family court judges, I’ve learned that foreign law has been invoked here in S.C.” She adds, that foreign law includes not just foreign religious law, but foreign secular law from various countries. Problem is few South Carolinians – or Americans for that matter – are aware of this, until now. Similar bills were successfully supported last year in Louisiana and Tennessee. Visit W. Thomas Smith Jr. at http://uswriter.com Mr. Smith is a contributor to Human Events. A former U.S. Marine rifle-squad leader and counterterrorism instructor, he writes about military/defense issues and has covered conflict in the Balkans, on the West Bank, in Iraq and Lebanon. He is the author of six books, and his articles appear in a variety of publications. E-mail him at marine1@uswriter.com. January 26, 2011 The Honorable Bill Rabon North Carolina General Assembly 16 West Jones Street, Room 2108 Raleigh, NC 27601‑2808 Re: Support For A Foreign Law Protection Amendment. Dear State Senator. Rabon, Good evening Sir. I hope this message finds you doing well. As your constituent, I wanted to bring your attention to the below Human Events news article. I find it troubling that this type of law is even needed, but unfortunately, with the federal government overreaching more and more each day and dedicating more of our taxpayers' money to the United Nations, passing such a law goes a long way in protecting our Constitutional Rights and civil liberties. It would also aid in upholding the Separation of Church and State, therefore stopping the interjection of personal beliefs and radical religious law, such as Islamic Shariah Law, into our legal system. As a former U.S. Marine, four tour Iraq War veteran, and current Army Reservist, I take our national defense and sovereignty very seriously, and like you, I took an oath to uphold our Constitution. I ask that you introduce or support the introduction and passage of foreign law protection legislation for North Carolina. Similar bills have already been introduced in Texas, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Louisiana. In closing, as the new legislative session gets underway, I am sure that you and your colleagues will be very busy. Therefore, thank you very much for your time. Any information or feedback that you can provide regarding this issue is greatly appreciated. I hope to hear from you soon. Respectfully, Mr. Aaron D. Yeargan [Contact Information Included In Original] | |||||||||
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
